Advertisement 1

Joe Oliver: One sign Trudeau wants to use regulation to strangle Energy East

TransCanada requested a 30-day suspension of its application and warned Energy East may be cancelled. There are consequences to politically motivated incompetence

Article content

The National Energy Board (NEB) made a fateful decision by extravagantly widening the scope of its review of the Energy East pipeline project to include greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the combustion of the oil it will transport. The project sponsor’s reaction was swift, chilling and entirely understandable. TransCanada Corporation requested a 30-day suspension of its application and warned the project may be cancelled. There are consequences to politically motivated incompetence.

Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

Let us step back and examine the NEB’s decision in its full inanity. The presumed rationale for calculating emissions from the end use of the product produced or transported is their potential impact on Canada’s climate change commitments. But that is not nearly as simple as it sounds. Take, for example, Canada’s significant reserves of rare earths that are critical for green energy, telecommunications, medical science and missile guidance.

These “technology metals” or chemical elements can be used to generate wind power, develop artificial intelligence, diagnose diseases or pulverize ISIL. How can regulatory authorities be expected to calculate the emissions created or reduced by these diverse applications, some of which are inherently unpredictable? We are getting close to the butterfly effect in chaos theory, where a small cause can have an immense unpredictable effect, like a butterfly flapping its wings in New Mexico ultimately creating a hurricane in China. Let’s agree that metaphysics is outside a regulator’s purview.

Article content

Let us step back and examine the NEB decision in its full inanity

Contrary to criticism from some environmental groups and politicians, the NEB had a long and respected history as a highly competent and objective regulator. Unfortunately, it has just undermined its credibility, effectiveness and independence. Its expanded review will politicize the regulatory processes and intrude on provincial jurisdiction, and has already put a resource project in considerable doubt, with severe economic implications for the country.

Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content

Specifically, the NEB announced it will assess both upstream and downstream GHG emissions to determine whether Energy East is in the public interest. There’s regulatory creep and then there’s regulatory leap.

Upstream refers to industrial activities from oil or gas extraction to construction of the pipeline. Downstream encompasses activities from when the resource leaves the pipeline, including refining, processing, transportation and end-use combustion. However, because there is not a global fuel shortage, additional fuel from Canada will not increase worldwide transportation. Arguably, the NEB should exclude combustion from transportation because there will be no increase in global GHG emissions.

Net global emissions rather than gross national emissions are relevant to climate change

After all, net global emissions rather than gross national emissions are relevant to climate change. So the appropriate methodology would be to estimate the net increase or decrease from a product’s end-use. That has implications I doubt environmentalists had in mind when they praised the regulator’s overreach. Gas imported by India replaces coal. Since natural gas emits about half the GHG of coal, net downstream emissions should be reduced accordingly. Furthermore, Canadian oil and gas replace fuel from countries with poorer environmental standards, driving down worldwide emissions.

Advertisement 4
Story continues below
Article content

The U.S. set a precedent for this comprehensive approach when its State Department concluded that the Keystone XL pipeline would be safer and emit less greenhouse gas than alternate forms of transportation like rail. The NEB should follow this logic.

Another problematic change is that the NEB intends to examine the impact of Canada’s laws and policies mandating GHG emission reductions on the pipeline’s economic viability. The NEB has really lost its bearings if it feels more capable of making a business decision than a multi-billion enterprise willing to risk its own capital.

Bottom line, the new review process will be longer, costlier and more unpredictable

Bottom line, the new review process will be longer, costlier and more unpredictable, will provide ammunition for intractable opponents to kill major resources projects, and will subject projects that are recommended for approval to more pre-conditions. For these reasons, it has been characterized as a new gold standard by the usual suspects. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency is highly likely to follow suit and other regulators may be encouraged to adopt it.

Pipelines should only be built if they are safe for Canadians and safe for the environment. However, that determination should be based on an independent, scientific regulatory review whose scope is limited to the direct impact of the construction and operation of the pipeline. It should not extend to an open-ended and uncertain estimate of global GHG emissions from the end-use of the product it is transporting to market.

Advertisement 5
Story continues below
Article content

Consider what is at stake. Energy East pipeline would transport 1.1 million barrels of oil a day, and would generate 14,000 jobs, $55 billion of economic growth, and $10 billion in government revenue. We urgently need to develop our natural resources, not throw road blocks at progress and prosperity.

The federal government doubtless had a hand in the NEB decision, which reflects its priorities – politics and green ideology over jobs and growth. It looks like the Prime Minister wants to kill Energy East, with regulatory cover. He may have his way.

Joe Oliver is the former minister of natural resources and of finance.

Article content
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

This Week in Flyers